Das Historische Buch 2002
Thomas Angerer | Prof. Dr. Mary FulbrookUniversity College London LebenslaufGeboren 1951, Cardiff, Wales. Aufgewachsen in Cardiff und Birmingham. Schulabschluss in 1969. Studium:Archaeology and Anthropology, Social and Political Sciences, Comparative History; Abschlüsse:MA (Cantab.), AM, PhD (Harvard) Thema der PhD thesis:Piety and Politics: Religion and the Rise of Absolutism in England, Württemberg and Prussia Tätigkeiten an Hochschulen oder Forschungseinrichtungen:Research Fellow, New Hall, Cambridge, 1979-1982 Zurückliegende Forschungsschwerpunkte
Religion and politics in England and Germany, 16th - 18th centuries Aktuelle Forschungsschwerpunkte
1. Sozialgeschichte der DDR (Buch für Yale University Press; 2004) Wichtige Monographien oder Herausgeberschaften
Hrsg:Fragen zur historischen Forschungslandschaft und zu aktuellen Debatten2. a) Wie kamen Sie zur Geschichtswissenschaft? Was hat Sie motiviert, Geschichte zu Ihrem Beruf zu machen? In general: interest and enjoyment; fascination with the varieties of human society and culture, the difference of the past, and the emergence of different notions of what it is to be human and how best to organise society and politics. With respect to German history in particular: the extraordinary contrast between the depths of the Holocaust, on the one hand, and a fascination with aspects of the country, the culture (Goethe, Bach) and the language, on the other. My mother, for both political and 'racial' reasons, left her native Berlin for Britain in 1936. She married a Canadian scientist (and pacifist), did not teach me German as a child, and I had to learn German as a second language at school. I both loved visiting Germany, and found it a deeply problematic place - thus wanted to explore and understand its history and culture more thoroughly. As a Beruf: I hugely enjoy teaching, research and writing and am fortunate to be paid to do these things. 2. b) Die Geschichtswissenschaften haben in den zurückliegenden Jahrzehnten zahlreiche Erweiterungen und Neuorientierungen der Frageansätze und Forschungsperspektiven erfahren. Welche halten Sie für die interessanteste und folgenreichste? The renewed explicit interest in theoretical questions, partly provoked by post-modernist challenges. The expansion of traditional political narratives by the newer combination of social / societal / structural approaches and cultural analyses - in other words, the overcoming of entrenched perspectival paradigms. Debates on the relations between historical representations and 'the past as it actually was", also on the relationships between politics and historical interpretations. See my recent book on Historical Theory (2002) for a much longer version of this! 2. c) Sehen Sie Forschungsfelder, denen man künftig mehr Aufmerksamkeit widmen sollte? The interaction of social/structural history and political/narrative history; comparative history, long view history; the interplay between national paradigms and wider (transnational) trends; terrorism and the international order. 2. d) Sollten sich Fachhistoriker mit historischen Argumenten in aktuellen politischen Debatten zu Wort melden, wie es jüngst wieder häufiger zu beobachten ist? Braucht unsere Gesellschaft mehr historische 'Politikberatung'? Not as historians - but as intelligent human beings and active citizens. 2. e) Die Universitäten kämpfen mit überfüllten Hörsälen und leeren Kassen, ringen um neue, kürzere Formen des Studierens (BA, MA). Welche Folgen würden Ihrer Meinung nach Studiengebühren und die Möglichkeit der Auswahl der Studenten durch die Universität für Lehre und Forschung in den Geschichtswissenschaften haben? Britain already has the more efficient BA and MA system, and university control over student admissions (with numbers strictly limited). The financial situation of British higher education is still dire and the recent Government White Paper has opened up the possibility of universities charging an additional £3000 in "top-up fees". This is likely to deter many young people from applying, particularly those from relatively low- or middle income homes. My own view is that students in Britain who have been to a private school for more than two years should be charged at a serious level for higher education (perhaps £8000 per year), while the fees for those who have been educated entirely in the state system should preferably be waived entirely, or at least remain unchanged at just over £1000. I don't think the position with respect to History would be distinctively different from most Arts and Humanities subjects; vocational subjects in which there is the prospect of high earnings after graduation (Law, Medicine) would be less affected, but students from privileged backgrounds will continue to dominate higher education. Part of the solution has to lie with schools, and with the wider class structure. In Britain, the inequalities between private and state education, and within the state sector, have urgently to be addressed; university admissions processes and funding mechanisms are also crucial, but too late to deal with the roots of inequality of access. 3. Stellen Sie bitte Ihren persönlichen Favoriten unter den historischen Büchern des Jahres 2002 kurz vor und erläutern Sie Ihre Wahl. (15-20 Zeilen.) Wierling, Dorothee: Geboren im Jahr Eins. Der Jahrgang 1949 in der DDR. Versuch einer Kollektivbiographie. Berlin: Ch. Links 2002. A brilliant attempt to deal with important empirical and theoretical questions concerning the original 'GDR generation' - those born in 1949, the year of the GDR's founding. Combines use of oral history with insightful analysis of a wide range of archival sources to produce a form of 'collective biography', making an important contribution to GDR history and to later twentieth-century social history and the analysis of generations more generally; and is also well written. |